blockchain tipsheet

stablecoin deal

House Financial Services Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D, CA) says her side is ready to move along stablecoin legislation according to Politico. “We continue to be in a relationship on stablecoins (…) We want to get it. We’re working with them — our staffs are still working,” Waters tells Politico’s Jasper Goodman. Her suggestion is that “a deal” is possible by the end of the year.  Read it.

what you should know: Back in March, the Ranking Member was optimistic about stablecoin legislation saying, “I believe the legislation could be passed when we get back to Congress… in [the space of] a few days.” And then in April at the first stablecoin hearing of the 118th Congress, she said the stablecoin bill had “no chance….” Are things really different this time? The pre-emptive (Federal floor, etc.) vs. states right issue is the main point of contention. But even solving this may not mean Dem leadership led by the White House – not Waters – is going to want a stablecoin bill to pass. Since FTX’s implosion, Dems have appeared to believe being “anti-crypto” is a winning position for the 2024 general election.

offshore USD stablecoins

As the United States arguably falls behind in creating a digital assets regulatory framework, more countries are opening up to the issuance of – local – U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins. Continue reading “Waters Says Stablecoin Bill Deal Possible ‘This Year’; Paxos Issues Offshore USD Stablecoin”

letter – SAB 121

Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) was the topic of a new letter by pro-digital assets members of Congress sent yesterday to prudential regulators (OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC and the National Credit Union Administration). See the letter (PDF).  The letter raises the October 31 determination by the Government Accountability Office that SAB 121 was a clear overreach by the securities regulator.

So why mail the prudential regulators? Congress wants them to step up, publicly, and NOT enforce SAB 121 as the supporting press release explains, “The lawmakers are urging the regulators to clarify that SAB 121 is not enforceable considering the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) finding that it constitutes a ‘rule’ for purposes of the Congressional Review Act (CRA).” Read the release.

The letter’s signers were bicameral and bipartisan and included House Financial Services (HFS) Chair Patrick McHenry (R, NC), Senator Cynthia Lummis (R, WY), Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D, NY), Rep. French Hill (R, AR), Rep. Ritchie Torres (D, NY), Rep. Mike Flood (R, NE) and Rep. Wylie Nickel (D, NC). Continue reading “Congressional Letters Fly On Digital Assets; CFTC Chair Admits Regulation May Be ‘Many Years’ Away”

regulatory breakthrough

In an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, CEO Cathie Wood of investment management firm Ark Invest said she think it’s possible for Bitcoin to reach $500,000 by 2025 or 2026. She saw a spot Bitcoin ETF as a key catalyst. She explained, “I think this regulatory breakthrough (the ETF) is very important to bring institutions online, effectively. I think BlackRock and Coinbase’s partnership is going to be very important. The other thing that is going to be very important – way back in 2018, Cambridge Associates, which advises institutions, said, ‘You may not like it. But, you better have a point-of-view because this is a new asset class, it’s a source of diversification..’ and we would add,  it’s a hedge – if you are talking about Bitcoin, in particular – against both inflation and deflation…” See a bit more of the interview on X.

more tips:

“it’s been a ten year dress rehearsal. we’re ready for the main event.” – Michael Sonnenshein, CEO, Grayscale on X

what you should know: We may know as soon as this week on Bitcoin spot market ETF approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission. More likely is approval by January. Continue reading “Regulatory Breakthrough With Bitcoin ETF; Digital Assets Hearing On Illicit Financing Today”

digital assets tax

Yesterday’s IRS public hearing titled, “Gross Proceeds and Basis Reporting by Brokers and Determination of Amount Realized and Basis for Digital Asset Transactions,” on its proposed digital asset tax rules lasted two hours and featured 12 witnesses who each offered 10-minute presentations on their views.

The hearing was lead by counsel from the IRS and attorneys with Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy.

11 of the 12 participating witnesses were decidedly critical of the proposed digital asset rules.

The complete hearing transcript is here.

Shehan Chandrasekera, head of tax strategy at CoinTracker, was among the witnesses and distilled his views on the proposed rules on X, “If implemented as proposed, the broker regulations will likely generate a significant amount of incomplete and inaccurate data for all stakeholders in the chain. That includes brokers, the IRS, and taxpayers. And, we are very concerned about this. We have recommendations to solve this issue and enhance traditional information reporting. Read Cointracker’s comment letter.

Marisa Tashman Coppel, senior counsel at Blockchain Association, prefaced her testimony on X saying, “The Proposal exceeds Treasury’s statutory authority, is overbroad and vague, and violates the APA and the Constitution – including the 1st, 4th, and 5th Amendments.” Read her tweet thread. Also, read Blockchain Association’s 39-page comment here (PDF).

One unique area impacted by the rules are collectibles known as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).  NFT marketplace OpenSea participated in the hearing and represented not only its own interests but that of artists and collectors. On the teleconference, OpenSea general counsel Gina Moon discussed the IRS’ digital assets tax proposal and how it doesn’t work with her company’s platform. “Collectibles are not representations of value though it may have value,” she began. Read her company’s 16-page comment here. In addition to addressing the proposed rules, there’s a condensed discussion of the NFT market and how it works.

more tips:

“The IRS Should Heed This Warning – Devs are not brokers” – Bill Hughes, counsel at Consensys, on CoinDesk

what you should know: Unlike Congressional hearings, this one felt devoid of politics in spite of the fact Treasury is run by Secretary Janet Yellen, an appointee of the Biden Administration. The IRS’ tone was one of learning and appreciation for testimony. At least yesterday it was. Continue reading “Digital Assets Tax Proposal Hearing Gets Critical Feedback; Senate Banking And Prudential Regulators”

new WSJ story

The Wall Street Journal reporting team added another chapter to crypto’s responsibility in terrorist financing. In a follow up to its October 10 story which had caused the publication to issue a correction, yesterday the paper revealed new sources including Israeli blockchain analytics firm BitOK and Israel’s National Bureau for Counter-Terror Financing (NBCTF).  The two organizations affirmed the $93 million in crypto used to finance terrorism in the WSJ’s original story and added still more: “Digital wallets identified by the NBCTF in two of these orders as being connected to the exchanges had received $41 million in crypto, according to research by Tel Aviv-based analytics and software firm BitOK.” Read more.

new WSJ story – reaction

Riot Platforms’ policy executive Sam Lyman, who wrote last week’s Forbes rebuttal of the WSJ findings, said on X of the new WSJ piece, “Another day, another hit piece on crypto. A reminder that these numbers more likely reflect the total volume of crypto that flowed between entities with links to Hamas—not the actual amount of money raised by the organization. Stripped of this context, you get Senators sending panicked letters to the White House with erroneous claims that Hamas had raised ‘over $130 million in crypto.'”

Fortune reporter Leo Schwartz noted a new wrinkle in yesterday’s WSJ article saying on X, “Important distinction – according to WSJ reporting, Hamas crypto usage has shifted from Bitcoin to Tether on Tron.”

what you should know: Make sure to read it. Gotta say – it’s hard to follow and it will be interesting to see if there is more access to the data used for the piece. Also, there is an anonymous quote from an “ex-NBCTF Official”: “It’s a drop in the ocean” regarding the known vs. unknown use of crypto in terrorist financing. This conflicts with the on-the-record testimony of former Chair of Israel’s AML authority Dr. Shlomit Wagman at the October 27 Senate Banking hearing who indicated crypto’s impact was limited in the financing of terrorism and urged more sanctions. But, she did not discount that crypto should be monitored.

midwestern op-ed

Editorial boards of major newspapers are steadily planting their flags on digital asset regulation (WSJ, WaPo). On Friday, the Chicago Tribune’s editorial board expressed its POV in an opinion titled, “SBF made crypto suffer. Now the industry must turn the page.”

The midwestern paper smells a rat in the criticism of crypto.

The Board writes, “We remember when East Coast critics in the 1980s were saying much the same about the financial futures entrepreneurs along LaSalle Street and Wacker Drive who were turning Chicago’s exchanges into world beaters. SBF’s brand of fraud wasn’t peculiar to cryptocurrencies, but rather was the same shameful, garden-variety fraud that could occur (and has occurred) just about anywhere in the world of finance.” Continue reading “WSJ Story Says More Terrorist Financing Via Crypto; IRS Hearing Happens Today”

bicameral CBDC legislation

On Wednesday, Sen. Rick Scott (R, FL) has thrown his “CBDC legislation” hat into the ring with the “Chinese CBDC Prohibition Act” which “prohibit the use of the Chinese Central Bank Digital Currency, also known as the Digital Yuan, by U.S. licensed money service businesses.” See the release. Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R, MO), Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on National Security, Illicit Finance, and International Financial Institutions, had originally introduced the legislation in the House back in February.

Also co-sponsoring up for the bill in the Senate were Ted Cruz (R, TX) and Marsha Blackburn (R, TN). Cruz said in a statement, “The Chinese Communist Party intends to use a central bank digital currency to spy on Americans’ private financial transactions. We must eliminate the CCP’s underhanded attempts to gain access to American financial data, that threaten their privacy and undermines our national security. This bill prevents the CCP from monitoring American transactions and financial data.”

what you should know: There are many flavors of Anti-CBDC bills from Republicans in Congress, but what makes this unique is, this bill specifically targets the Chinese central bank’s CBDC.  Moreover, there are national security implications as the stature of the U.S. Dollar, the world’s reserve currency, may increasingly be threatened by China’s Digital Yuan. Continue reading “Scott, Leutkemeyer Target Chinese CBDC; AML Crossroads Approaches”

approps amendments

As negotiations continue on the Hill regarding appropriations, at least two digital asset-related amendments were introduced by Republicans in the House of Representatives yesterday. Reigning in the SEC and CBDCs was the focus.

Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R, MN) said, “[Gary Gensler] is as ineffective as he is incompetent. Fortunately, my nonpartisan appropriations amendment to reign in SEC enforcement abuses against the digital asset industry passed the House today with no opposition. Congress will hold unelected bureaucrats accountable.” Incidents involving Coinbase and Grayscale and the agency’s SAB 121 bulletin are all identified as examples of SEC overreach. See Emmer’s 5-minute statement on the House floor on X.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R, OH) took the opportunity to target CBDCs, a House Republican bugaboo, as an approps amendment.  He said, “Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) should never be designed, developed, or established. It’s like building the Death Star and saying you won’t turn it on. Today I offered an amendment to stop the creation of [CBDCs]…” On X, see Rep. Davidson’s speech on the House floor.

Emmer’s (here) and Davidson’s (here) amendments were adopted by voice vote in the House.

more tips:

You Can’t Regulate What You Don’t Understand (2.0) – Alex Grieve, Paradigm

cop on the beat

Showing Congress that it’s the “cop on the beat,” the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) tallied up its fiscal year 2023 enforcement actions ending September 30, 2023 in a press release yesterday. It’s lead category was “digital assets” in which the regulator “brought 47 actions involving conduct related to digital asset commodities, representing more than 49% of all actions filed during that period.” Overall (digital assets plus everything else), the CFTC said it had “over $4.3 billion in penalties, restitution and disgorgement” in the fiscal year. Read the release.

CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam has long advocated that his agency is the appropriate “cop on the beat” for digital assets cash markets since pre-FTX-implosion and the consideration of the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act (DCCPA) in the last Congress. Continue reading “Appropriations Amendments Address SEC, CBDCs; McHenry Sees Crypto Legislative Window”

Fed on CBDCs, stablecoins

The Fed still sees a priority with stablecoin regulation, not so much on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) according to The Federal Reserve’s Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr at yesterday’s DC Fintech Week event. Paraphrasing Barr, Fortune’s Leo Schwartz tweeted on X, “…the central bank has not yet made a decision on CBDCs, but wouldn’t move forward with a retail version without authorization from Congress and the White House.” Read more  on Fortune.

what you should know: The Fed has yet to publicly suggest that a CBDC is imminent. As Barr stated, Congress would need to authorize a CBDC, too.

Rep. Nickel

Rep. Wiley Nickel (D, NC), a member of the House Financial Services (HFS) Committee, represented Congress at DC FinTech Week yesterday and spoke across a range of digital asset topics. On the stablecoin bill, he remains optimistic with only one issue remaining between the opposing sides, i.e. “state right-ers and having a strong federal floor” for stablecoins. Nickel said that the views were not very far apart and all that remained was the “sausage making process” for the bill to eventually become law.

what you should know: Nickel was among five Democrats on HFS who vote for [H.R.4766] Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act during the markup in July. Continue reading “Stablecoins and Tokenization Featured At DC FinTech Week; Coinbase Grows Lobby”