Tag: blockchain

Posted on

Brokered Deposits Bedevil; DC Goes On The Road

Brokered deposits

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… prefer it by email? Sign up here.

hot money

On Monday, American Banker continued its look into the troubles for fiat/crypto rails provider Silvergate Capital Corporation and something called “brokered deposits,” a.k.a. “hot money.” Dennis McFadden of Better Markets, a DC-based organization with interests in financial markets, offers his opinion to AB’s Claire Williams: “Like water seeping into the cracks of a foundation, crypto companies have been relentless in attempting to penetrate the core of the banking business for years and this appears to be one of the cracks.” Read more (subscription). And visit the FDIC to read more on brokered deposits.

McFadden’s LinkedIn profile says that he was part of the Biden-Harris Transition Federal Reserve, Banking and Securities Agency Review Team in addition to past senior staff roles with three Democratic Senators.

Also, in early January, he penned an op-ed for the Financial Times which offered support for the work of the SEC in 2022 while simultaneously delivering a scathing indictment of the CFTC due to the FTX implosion. Read it.

need banking partner

Cryptocurrency exchange Binance is suspending US Dollar bank transfers beginning February 8 according to notices sent to customers and reported by The Wall Street Journal.  A spokesperson says the suspension was expected to last a “couple weeks” until a new banking partner could be established. No other reason was given as to why they lost their current unnamed partner. Last month, The Washington Post reported that Binance was “part of a long-running investigation into potential violations of money-laundering rules.” The U.S. attorney’s office for the Western District of Washington in Seattle is involved. Read more.
Continue reading “Brokered Deposits Bedevil; DC Goes On The Road”

Posted on

Bank Lobby Wants Crypto Isolated; FTX Debtors Want FTX Money Back

TradFi Lobbying

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… prefer it by email? Sign up here.

TradFi’s crypto island vision

Traditional finance organization Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), which says its membership represents 99% of all banks in the U.S., is lobbying Congress  to “take a closer look at regulatory agencies’ ‘inadequate’ oversight of crypto and to resist efforts to let nonbank stablecoin issuers access the Fed’s payment rails,” reports Politico’s Zach Warmbrodt.

Indeed, the ICBA wants crypto explicitly separated from the banking system. The threat is apparently so acute that cryptocurrency goals lead the 2023 agenda list: “ICBA urges Congress to exercise robust oversight of the federal financial agencies. In particular, community bankers are concerned about agencies overstepping their statutory authority in rulemaking; the use of informal communications, including press statements and social media, to convey expectations and effectively make rules outside of the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act; and inadequate oversight of non-bank financial firms, including financial technology and cryptocurrency firms which pose significant risk to the broader financial system.” See the ICBA agenda.

Brown calls for crypto hearing

Senate Banking Chair Sherrod Brown (D, OH) has set a hearing titled “Crypto Crash: Why Financial System Safeguards are Needed for Digital Assets” for February 14. See Senate Banking’s February hearing schedule. The title for the hearing informs Brown’s pointed misgivings rather than potential for unlocking innovation in cryptocurrencies. Though he sent a letter in November to Treasury Secretary Yellen, Chair Brown offhandedly suggested at December’s “FTX implosion” hearing whether crypto should be regulated at all – perhaps suggesting that keeping it unregulated is to keep it outside of the U.S. financial system -another tactic of anti-crypto forces.

Keep an eye on: will Ranking Member Tim Scott (R, SC) attempt a partial roll out of his digital assets agenda at the hearing?
Continue reading “Bank Lobby Wants Crypto Isolated; FTX Debtors Want FTX Money Back”

Posted on

Scott Announces Digital Assets Framework for Banking; Durbin Inveighs On Crypto

Senate Banking

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… prefer it by email? Sign up here.

Scott on digital assets framework

New Senate Banking Ranking Member, Tim Scott (R, SC), announced that the Committee will be developing a framework for digital assets. From the press release: “The Committee will work to facilitate a bipartisan regulatory framework that accounts for both the rapid growth in the use of cryptocurrencies and the concerns raised by high-profile failures.” Read all of Scott’s priorities. However, this will be no easy task for Senator Scott as he bumps up against the agenda of Banking Chair Sherrod Brown (D, OH), who has expressed deep skepticism about cryptocurrencies – including at the December Senate Banking hearing on FTX where the Chair raised the issue of whether “regulatory clarity” was even needed.

Durbin inveighs against crypto

From the Congressional Record on Wednesday comes an entry (see it) from Sen. Dick Durbin (D, IL) who wanted to talk crypto on the Senate floor. Back in December, Durbin was critical of digital assets in the December Senate Agriculture hearing on FTX with CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam.

He did not hold back this time either with an 1,800+ word speech: “Let me tell you about crypto’s terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad year–2022. Let’s start with the most popular cryptocurrency, Bitcoin. In 2022, the currency cratered, losing more than 60 percent of its value in 1 year. To put it in perspective, if you bought one Bitcoin at the start of 2022 and held on to it today, you would be down $25,000. Think of all the Americans who could have held on to that cash for family needs or to cover a downpayment on their first home. Their money is gone…” Matt Damon, Larry David, and LeBron James are implicated as well by the Senator. Read the full speech.

Continue reading “Scott Announces Digital Assets Framework for Banking; Durbin Inveighs On Crypto”

Posted on

Digital Asset Democrats Designated; McHenry Critical Of SEC Chair Gensler

House Financial Services starts

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… prefer it by email? Sign up here.

digital asset Democrats

Yesterday afternoon, just prior to the “Organizational meeting” for the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D, CA) announced selections for Democratic subcommittee posts. The Majority Republicans announced their appointments last week.

For the new “Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion,” the eight Democratic members will be:

    • Rep. Stephen F. Lynch (MA), Ranking Member
    • Rep. Bill Foster (IL)
    • Rep. Josh Gottheimer (NJ)
    • Rep. Ritchie Torres (NY)
    • Rep. Brad Sherman (CA)
    • Rep. Al Green (TX)
    • Rep. Sean Casten (IL)
    • Rep. Wiley Nickel (NC)

breaking down the Dems

Ranking Member Rep. Lynch brings his previous Congressional FinTech experience which includes his work as Chairman of the Task Force on Financial Technology  – originally established by Maxine Waters – in the 117th Congress.

Lynch, Foster, Gottheimer and Torres were members of the Congressional Blockchain Caucus in the last Congress with Foster assuming a caucus co-chair role. Rep. Gottheimer introduced the “Stablecoin Innovation and Protection Act” early last year – one of many stablecoin bills put forward in the last Congress.

Rep. Brad Sherman has been a notable critic of cryptocurrencies and Congressional blockchain buzz and will undoubtedly provide a sharp point-of-view in opposition to crypto proponents of the Committee regardless of party.

Rep. Al Green was Chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations in the previous Congress and held a hearing in 2021 on “Crypto Frenzy” which looked skeptically at cryptocurrencies. He also asked during the questioning of current FTX John Ray at an HFS hearing in December if the implosion of crypto exchange FTX was “all one big mistake” and due to “sincere ignorance” on former FTX CEO Mr. Sam Bankman-Fried’s part. Mr. Ray answered dutifully, “Ultimately, others will judge him by actions.”

Continue reading “Digital Asset Democrats Designated; McHenry Critical Of SEC Chair Gensler”

Posted on

Senators Pressure Bank On FTX; Digital Assets Subcommittee Prioritizing Stablecoins

Congress questions Silvergate Capital

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… prefer it by email? Sign up here.

senators pressure crypto bank

Senators Elizabeth Warrren (D, MA), John Kennedy (R, LA) and Roger Marshall (R, KS) announced in a press release yesterday that they still aren’t happy with bank holding company and fiat/crypto rails provider Silvergate Capital Corporation after the company was sent a December letter filled with the Senators’ questions about the company’s involvement with crypto exchange FTX.

From the Senators’ release: “The bank’s response (see it) was largely evasive and refused to provide much of the requested information on the grounds that it was ‘confidential supervisory information.'” The Senators also sent another letter on Monday to Silvergate CEO Alan Lane saying, “Your response confirms the extent of this failure – but then neglects to provide key information needed by Congress to understand why and how these failures occurred.”

As outlined in a December press release, the bipartisan group of Senators original inquiry was fueled by “concerns about Silvergate’s failure to apply extensive review processes to FTX and Alameda, and the possible role the bank may have played in the loss of billions of dollars of customer funds.” Or put another way: how did a U.S. bank go about vetting a Bahamian crypto exchange?

innovation + stablecoin bill

Rep. French Hill (R, AR) said on Fox Business yesterday morning that the opportunity he sees for any blockchain-related legislation in the new Congress starts with nurturing innovation. The new Chair of the Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion Subcommittee said, “Stepping away from cryptocurrency or even a digital dollar, think about the innovation around fintech and blockchain in the future -we want that done here in the United States… we need a solid regulatory framework.”

A stablecoin bill appears to be a top priority as Rep. Hill said, “Last year, we had some work with both the Treasury and House Democrats moving towards a stablecoin bill. This would tell investors and consumers what’s the value -what backs the stablecoin. How do you know what the value is? How frequently is it valued? When are their financial statements published? How is it overseen for both consumer and investor safety as well as to be able to be used in the commercial marketplace? We just don’t have that.” But maybe soon. Hear more from the Fox Business interview [begins 2:20].

In an interview with Bloomberg TV yesterday afternoon, Rep. Hill shared additional nuggets on his agenda, “I think we need to look with our colleagues both in the Senate and House Agriculture Committees and make sure that we can develop a ‘brightline’ test of what should be traded in an Ag or commodity type environment versus something that’s a security and under the regulation of the SEC.” See the full Bloomberg interview [6:15 in length].

Continue reading “Senators Pressure Bank On FTX; Digital Assets Subcommittee Prioritizing Stablecoins”

Posted on

House Financial Services Starts Wednesday; Regulating Twitter Payments Including Crypto

House Financial Services

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… Want it by email? Sign up here.

McHenry and Waters return

Rep. Patrick McHenry (R, NC) has scheduled the first meeting of the House Financial Services (HFS) Committee under his leadership as Chair.  Taking place on Wednesday (2/1) beginning at 1 p.m., the session will be focused on 118th Congress organizational housekeeping. Live webcast will be here. Agenda items include appointing Democratic HFS committee members to subcommittees by Ranking Member Rep. Maxine Waters (D, CA) including the “Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion” – a new HFS committee. Majority members have already been appointed by the Chair.

The jurisdiction of the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion, chaired by Rep. French Hill (R, AR), is broad according to the rules resolution and begins with “digital assets, including but not limited to cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)”. Read all the proposed Digital Assets Subcommittee rules (PDF) – even artificial intelligence (AI) takes a bow.

not FDIC insured

Back in October, then Acting-Chair Martin Gruenberg of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) openly expressed concern at a Brookings event about crypto companies: “…false and misleading statements, either direct or implied, by crypto–asset entities concerning the availability of federal deposit insurance for a given crypto–asset product, violate the law.” Fast forward to yesterday when Axios reported cryptocurrency exchange Gemini is alleged to have told some customers that it’s Earn product was FDIC-insured when it was not.  Axios’ Emily Peck and Matt Phillips note, “Some 340,000 Earn customers now have had almost $1 billion worth of assets frozen on the platform. It’s unclear if they’ll ever get it back.” Read more. The article notes that the language used by Gemini may not be illegal.

Emmer on legislative possibilities

House GOP Whip Rep. Tom Emmer (R, MN) discusses his priorities as it relates to digital assets in the 118th Congress on “The Scoop” podcast hosted by The Block’s Frank Chaparro. Emmer offers an array of opinions including his belief that “crypto will actually insure the status of the U.S. Dollar if we do this right.” But, he admits that among the naysayers, the defense hawks on the Republican side are a challenge to his vision.  On digital asset legislative possibilities, Rep. Emmer tempers expectations, “There will be a series of clarifying bills on the laws that we’re talking about: there will be data privacy stuff that we’ll work on related to this; there will be clarifying language so you can categorize digital assets, so you know who the regulator is, the jurisdiction that you’re underneath –  -trying to give people more clarity – I think those are realistic. But people out there should not expect that there’s going to be this explosion of new legislation that is suddenly going to solve all these problems.” Hear the podcast (48 minutes).
Continue reading “House Financial Services Starts Wednesday; Regulating Twitter Payments Including Crypto”

Posted on

White House Anti-Crypto Stance Threatens Bipartisan Coalition; US CBDC In The Mix

White House goes anti-crypto

Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… Want it by email? Sign up here.

White House throws 3-pitch crypto strikeout

STRIKE 1 – On Friday, with a tip of the cap to President Biden’s digital assets Executive Order last March, the White House released, “The Administration’s Roadmap to Mitigate Cryptocurrencies’ Risks.” The emphasis of the report is entirely on “risks.” Also – note the use of “cryptocurrencies’ risks” rather than “digital assets risks” in the title. Is the White House cutting to the chase on what it thinks about the broader context of digital assets and blockchain technology? Co-author and White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese warned Congress later in the day, “We’re ready to work w/ Congress to address regulatory gaps, but it would be a grave mistake to reverse course and deepen ties btw crypto and the financial system.”

STRIKE 2 – At the same time, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) announced that it was not letting digital assets bank and Wyoming-based Custodia Bank become a member of the Federal Reserve System. “The firm’s novel business model and proposed focus on crypto-assets presented significant safety and soundness risks…” – no crypto allowed in the U.S. banking system in other words. Expressing “surprise and disappoointment,” Custodia Bank’s founder and CEO Caitlin Long said Custodia’s master account application at the Federal Reserve Board of Kansas City is still pending. Perhaps -but it’s also mired in the courts. This is the front lines of TradFi vs DeFi.

STRIKE 3 – Finally, at the same time as its Custodia bank announcement, The FRB issued a 14-page policy statement warning banks about their involvement in crypto on the grounds of “safety and soundness.” According to a separate press release, “The Board has not identified any authority permitting national banks to hold most crypto-assets, including bitcoin and ether, as principal in any amount, and there is no federal statute or rule expressly permitting state banks to hold crypto-assets as principal. Therefore, the Board would presumptively prohibit state member banks from engaging in such activity under section 9(13) of the Act.” In a four-page memo to its Board of Governors, The Fed boils the policy down including the intent to rein in state banks interested in crypto… like those in Wyoming?

will pro-crypto Dems desert?

With a Democratic White House appearing to fight against efforts to advance digital assets legislation, where does Friday’s “3-pitch strikeout” leave pro-crypto Democrats especially as the next Presidential election approaches in 2024? Some Democratic political strategists around the President may believe crypto and digital assets as something to use against Republicans in ’24.

Continue reading “White House Anti-Crypto Stance Threatens Bipartisan Coalition; US CBDC In The Mix”

Posted on

Wishful Thinking? Regulating Crypto To Bring Offshore Onshore

Onshore Offshore

Amidst the most recent crypto cataclysm, hopeful narratives have emerged suggesting that the U.S. government and other jurisdictions could have prevented the implosion of offshore firms such as FTX.

The argument offers two similar threads related to regulatory guardrails:

    • Stay in the U.S. instead of leave: Better crypto-specific regulation in the United States would have encouraged companies to stay local and therefore discouraged unregulated development elsewhere to “infect” unsuspecting U.S. consumers.
    • Grow in the U.S. instead of nothing: Clear regulation in the U.S. presumably grows the crypto industry by inspiring entrepreneurship in the United States. Lack of clarity does not promote risk-taking for which U.S. entrepreneurship is known.

FTX’s international unit presumably would not be experiencing bankruptcy today if it was required to adhere to current United States banking laws let alone anything crypto-specific that may bubble up someday. Of course, a CFO might have helped, too.

It’s fair to ask, would FTX’s founders ever founded anything in the U.S.? Were they only interested in exploiting unregulated environments? Maybe so. And so… does that need to be “onshored”? Doesn’t seem like it.

The European Union (EU) is thinking about how to take a crack at regulating offshore entities but is still far from pulling the trigger. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) will be on the hook in the EU once Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation takes effect in 2024 or thereafter.

Continue reading “Wishful Thinking? Regulating Crypto To Bring Offshore Onshore”