Crypto Mixer Developer Gets 5 Years In Netherlands Court; SAB 121 Vote Today In Senate

developer found guilty

crypto mixer – developer convicted

Can a coder be convicted of money laundering even if all he did was the coding for a crypto mixing service?

In the Netherlands, the answer is “yes.” In the U.S., we’ll see.

Alexey Pertsev, one of the developers of Tornado Cash, a crypto mixer, was sentenced yesterday in a Netherlands’ courtroom to a prison term of five years and four months for laundering $2.2 billion in crypto assets. According to DL News, Judge Henrieke Slaar said, “Tornado Cash in its nature and functioning is a tool intended for criminals…The criminal user is fully facilitated.” Read more.

more tips: 

    • The ruling against Pertsev, in Dutch, is here.

crypto mixer – reaction

Coin Center’s Peter Van Valkenburgh commented on X, “I’m sad for Alexey and angry that the money laundering laws in the Netherlands have such a low threshold for intent, essentially mere negligence.”

Given there is a case currently pending  in U.S. courts against the developers of Tornado Cash brought by the Department of Justice, he added, “Nothing in this ruling should prejudice or carry weight in Roman Storm‘s case in the [Southern District of New York].” Read Van Valkenburgh’s tweet thread.

In early April, Coin Center, DeFi Education and Blockchain Association brought three separate briefs supporting the Tornado Cash developers.

Meanwhile, Treasury and Congress has taken note of the crypto mixer challenges.

Last October, Treasury proposed a new rulemaking “that identifies international Convertible Virtual Currency Mixing (CVC mixing) as a class of transactions of primary money laundering concern.” Read more. Continue reading “Crypto Mixer Developer Gets 5 Years In Netherlands Court; SAB 121 Vote Today In Senate”

Prudential Regulators Join Oversight Hearings This Week; Tornado Cash Decision Today

enter prudential regulators

this week – prudential hearings

Prudential regulators – the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (Fed), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) – will be meeting with the House Financial Services (HFS) Committee on Wednesday and Senate Banking on Thursday.

There are no digital assets topics on the HFS Committee’s memo (PDF), but the prudential group has been active in the digital assets discussion with the Committee in the past.

In March 2023 (letter) and then again in November 2023 (letter), HFS Chair Patrick McHenry (R, NC), and Senator Cynthia Lummis (R, WY) spearheaded an effort to get the prudential regulators to admit that SAB 121 was a bad idea, in so many words.

The House passed a resolution last week rescinding SAB 121 – the Senate, and then the President will be next.

Scheduled to appear on Wednesday at the HFS hearing are:

    • Michael Barr, Vice Chair, Federal Reserve
    • Martin Gruenberg, Chair, FDIC
    • Michael Hsu, Acting Comptroller, OCC

what you should know: The literal “elephant in the room” for both hearings will be FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg and his resignation which Republicans want and Dem leadership does not want (such as Senate Banking Chair Sherrod Brown (D, OH) – read) over the recent sexual harassment scandal at the FDIC. Read about it in the WSJ.

more: DOJ, money transmission

Following up on news from Punchbowl on Sunday, Senator Cynthia Lummis’ (R, WY) office published a press release yesterday about the Congressional letter penned by the Senator and Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D, OR) expressing concerns to Attorney General Merrick Garland. The Senators say that the DOJ’s recent interpretation of what constitutes a money transmitter – rules originally set up by the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) – are troubling. Continue reading “Prudential Regulators Join Oversight Hearings This Week; Tornado Cash Decision Today”

FIT 21 To Get House Floor Vote – How Many Dems Will Follow?; Blockchain Bills Heading To Floor, Too

House Floor Votes

bills this month – FIT 21

According to a statement Friday, the digital asset market structure bill  – a.k.a. “Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act” or FIT 21 [H.R.4763] – from House Agriculture and House Financial Services (HFS) will finally reach the House floor later this month after getting approved in separate markups last July.

HFS Chair Patrick McHenry (R, NC) said, “For far too long, the U.S. digital asset ecosystem has been plagued by regulatory uncertainty that has stifled innovation and left consumers unprotected… This comprehensive market structure legislation—the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act—is the culmination of years of bipartisan efforts to finally provide clarity. This includes an unprecedented joint effort by the House Financial Services and Agriculture Committees…” Read the HFS statement.

According to the Floor schedule, FIT 21 will come up the week of May 20 with amendments due this Thursday, May 16.

what you should know: Politico’s Eleanor Mueller reports on X that Majority Whip Tom Emmer’s (R, MN) Securities Clarity Act [H.R.3572] has been added to a revised version of the bill among other edits for the bill.

Like H.J.R.109, the vote for FIT 21 will be a view into the crypto “soul” of the Democrat caucus.  Already in the HFS markup last July (House Ag’s markup was a voice vote), six Democrats voiced support for FIT 21: Rep. Ritchie Torres (D, NY), Rep. Wiley Nickel (D, NC), Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D, NJ), Rep. Steven Horsford (D, NV), Brittany Pettersen (D, CO) and Rep. Jim Himes, (D, CT).  And, since the markup, Republicans have been working with various Dems to add more edits and amendments to grow support.

FWIW, Rep. Himes, Horsford and Pettersen did not support H.J.R.109.

Therefore, will even more Dems support FIT 21 than the 21 Democrats who supported rescinding the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121?

(By the way.. 21.. crypto’s lucky number?) Continue reading “FIT 21 To Get House Floor Vote – How Many Dems Will Follow?; Blockchain Bills Heading To Floor, Too”

Trump Embraces Crypto, Taunts Gensler, Biden; Senate And SAB 121 Next Week?

Former President Trump

Senate and SAB 121

With the House passing the joint resolution to rescind the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin on Wednesday – with an unexpected 21 House Democrats joining the Majority Republicans – the ball is now in the Senate’s court.

Yesterday, Senator Cynthia Lummis (R, WY), who is guiding the Senate version of the resolution – S.J.Res.59, tweeted, “I am proud the House passed the bipartisan SAB 121 CRA led by [Rep. Mike Flood (R, NE)] and [Rep. Wiley Nickel (D, NC)]. We cannot allow the administration to regulate tools for financial freedom out of existence. Time for the Senate to swiftly overturn this misguided rule.” See the tweet.

what you should know: And swiftly they must. It appears possible that the “privileged” resolution could reach the Senate floor next week. Assuming Senate Republicans will unify and vote “no” as their colleagues did in the House, the difference of opinion on digital assets among Senate Democrats will be in full view. It will only take a few to put the resolution on the President’s desk.

will Biden veto?

Does President Biden use his veto power – as he threatened on Wednesday – on something as relatively small as rescinding SAB 121 which could potentially raise crypto up as even more of an issue in the 2024 general election?

The halcyon days of the Executive Order on Digital Assets of March 2022 have been replaced at the White House (FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried didn’t help) into defensive posturing, if not hostility, when it comes to crypto. Dem leadership appears to believe being “anti-crypto” is a winning issue in November. And the veto would make Democrats very publicly “own it.” Continue reading “Trump Embraces Crypto, Taunts Gensler, Biden; Senate And SAB 121 Next Week?”

House Votes To Rescind SEC Rule On Crypto Custody; President Biden Threatens Veto

SAB 121

SAB 121 resolution – passage

H.J.Res 109, which rescinds the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 – a “guidance” preventing regulated banks from providing crypto custody – was easily passed in the House yesterday by voice vote.

Given the Republican majority, the result was not surprising.

In the wake of the voice vote, House Financial Services (HFS) Chair Patrick McHenry (R, NC) asked for a roll call vote likely seeking to shed light on support across the aisle.

Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D, MA) told House Dems to vote “No” on the resolution.

But just as the roll call vote was to begin, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) disrupted the floor proceedings with a motion to remove Rep. Mike Johnson (R, LA) as speaker.

After MTG‘s motion was tabled (killed), voting began on H.J.R.109 – Members had only 5 minutes in which to submit their preference.

Final vote was 228-182 to support the resolution to repeal SAB 121.

Visit the Clerk’s website for the complete tally.

21 Democrats voted for the resolution – prior to the vote, only three HFS Democratic members (Nickel/Gottheimer/Torres) had been known to support the resolution.

This was a win for Chair McHenry. (He celebrated.)

It was also a win for Reps. Flood and Nickel, the resolution’s sponsor and co-sponsor, respectively.

The other big news may have been President Joseph Biden‘s statement on the resolution which made clear where his Administration stands on digital assets. More below… Continue reading “House Votes To Rescind SEC Rule On Crypto Custody; President Biden Threatens Veto”

Two Peas In Two Pods: NYDFS Superintendent Harris And SEC Chair Gensler

New York Department of Financial Services Adrienne Harris

right on cue

Just before the SEC Enforcement hearing by the House Financial Services (HFS) Capital Markets Subcommittee yesterday, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler appeared on CNBC’s airwaves with Squawk Box host Andrew Ross Sorkin.

See the interview.

Gensler began by openly complaining that Sorkin was asking too many questions about crypto given its diminutive size in comparison to the traditional stock and bond markets.

Sorkin bulled ahead anyway as Gensler largely continued his mantra that digital assets remained a lawless wasteland.

On whether Ethereum was a security or commodity and whether there would be an Ethereum ETF, Gensler demurred (as he did to HFS Chair Patrick McHenry (R, NC) back in April 2023). He said yesterday:

… to me, the fundamental question is, how do we ensure that the American investor is protected and right now they’re not getting the required or needed disclosures and the intermediaries in the center of this rather centralized market generally are conflicted and doing things we would never allow the New York Stock Exchange to do.”

more tips:

    • Gary Gensler Says It’s Our Fault the SEC Appears So Focused on Crypto – Decrypt

Continue reading “Two Peas In Two Pods: NYDFS Superintendent Harris And SEC Chair Gensler”

Politics And Digital Assets Mingle At SEC Enforcement Hearing; Casten Intros Mixer Bill

Rep. Ann Wagner

At the beginning of today’s House Financial Services (HFS) Capital Markets Subcommittee hearing chaired by Ann Wagner (R, MO), the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) enforcement strategy – particularly around crypto – appeared to be in focus.

quick tips:

    • When the hearing concluded, it was clear that Republicans tried to keep the hearing positioned around the wider abuse of power it sees at the SEC.
    • Meanwhile, Democrats focused mostly on digital assets (some climate change issues), its support for aggressive enforcement and the need to protect consumers in the space.
    • At one point late in the Q&A section, Rep. Bryan Steil (R, WI) observed, “I feel like some of my colleagues might feel like we’re in the financial digital assets subcommittee, not the capital markets subcommittee.
    • Also, Rep. Sean Casten (D, IL) tipped his hand on new crypto mixer legislation he’ll be rolling out later this week.
    • Ultimately, whether you were Republican or Democrat, “digital assets” was the elephant in the hearing room.

See hearing page with testimony and video.

opening

Wagner and the subcommittee’s Ranking Member Rep. Brad Sherman (D, CA) presented their predictable views  – Wagner criticizing the SEC’s enforcment strategy, Sherman defending it.

Initially, it appeared the common thread for the Subcommittee hearing would be on digital assets.

witnesses

Next, the witnesses presented (click name for prepared testimony):

Paul Eckert, Professor, College of William & Mary Law School

Eckert was critical of the slow process of SEC enforcement actions which he suggested should be concluded within two years. Today, only 50% of SEC actions achieve such a goal, he said.

Nick Morgan, Founder, Investor Choice Advocates Network

Morgan was highly critical of “regulation by enforcement” and provided anecdotes of what he saw as an abuse of power by the SEC that ultimately harms victims.

Andrew Vollmer, Scholar at the Mercatus Center, former SEC Deputy General Counsel

Vollmer saw some commendable elements of the SEC enforcement strategy, but was critical of three areas in need of reform:  the civil monetary penalty amounts, the new “disgorgement” strategy for the courts and Administrative procedures which are “biased against the defendant.”

John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting

Reed Stark declared “regulation by enforcement” was false and was not the strategy of the SEC- he believed they were “enforcing the  law.” Reed Stark saw an industry that was attacking the regulator and his presentation was the only one solely focused on digital assets and defending the SEC.

Next, Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D, CA) spoke briefly and echoed themes from her statement the night before at the House Joint Resolution 109 hearing in front of the House Rules Committee. She was entirely supportive of the SEC’s enforcement strategy. Continue reading “Politics And Digital Assets Mingle At SEC Enforcement Hearing; Casten Intros Mixer Bill”

Robinhood Awaits Latest SEC Enforcement Action; Rep. Flood Presents SAB 121 Resolution

Rep. Flood on SAB 121

enforcement – Robinhood

Publicly-traded Robinhood Markets has received a Wells Notice after a face-to-face meeting between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler and Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev in January.

For a company offering crypto products and services, a Wells Notice signifies that an enforcement action by the SEC is on its way.

Robinhood explained in its required notice to investors yesterday:

“On May 4, 2024, [Robinhood Markets] received a ‘Wells Notice’ from the Staff of the SEC (the ‘Staff’) stating that the Staff has advised RHC that it made a ‘preliminary determination’ to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against RHC alleging violations of Sections 15(a) and 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The potential action may involve a civil injunctive action, public administrative proceeding, and/or a cease-and-desist proceeding and may seek remedies that include an injunction, a cease-and-desist order, disgorgement, pre-judgment interest, civil money penalties, and censure, revocation, and limitations on activities.”

See Robinhood’s 8-K filing (PDF) with the details.

more tips:

    • Crypto lawyers say SEC is ‘abusing’ the Wells process as part of ‘carpet bombing campaign’ against crypto – The Block

what you should know: With H.J.R 109 on the docket for a House Floor vote this week, the SEC led by its Democratic majority and Chair Gary Gensler may be gearing up for more actions to counter the “overreach at the SEC” narrative being driven by Republicans in the House.

enforcement – reaction

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R, MN) reacted on X to the Robinhood news yesterday by saying, “Regulation by intimidation” and then later adding, “These Wells notices seem to be Gary Gensler’s desperate, last-ditch attempts to intimidate and antagonize digital asset innovators.”

Commenting on X, Rep. John Rose (R, TN) said, “The [SEC] exceeded its mandate to protect investors and maintain fair, orderly markets by issuing a Wells Notice to [Robinhood], a precursor to enforcement action.   I’m proud to help lead the effort to provide clarity by passing the FIT for the 21st Century Act so that rogue regulators like [Gary Gensler] can focus on their mandate to protect investors and not disrupt innovation.”

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said on X last night, “Over the last three years, we’ve reached a state of regulatory onslaught that is harmful to American companies and consumers. The SEC’s continued attack on crypto, coupled with recent rule proposals like the one related to predictive data analytics, mark yet another improper attempt by the administrative state to stifle innovation…” Read Tenev’s tweet thread.

Later, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong commented on Tenev’s tweet, “Welcome to the club – you’re in good company 🙂 The courts will help get clarity – but the right solution longer term is we need to elect pro-crypto candidates. This is why Coinbase has supported Fairshake superpac, and StandWithCrypto[.]org. Hope y’all can join us!”

Continue reading “Robinhood Awaits Latest SEC Enforcement Action; Rep. Flood Presents SAB 121 Resolution”