Tag: tokenization

state of stablecoins

At yesterday’s State of Crypto event produced by CoinDesk in Washington, D.C., an appearance by Senators Cynthia Lummis (R, WY) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D, NY) provided optimism on digital assets legislation. Rather than identifying their own “Responsible Financial Innovation Act” [S.2281] as the low-hanging fruit, they said stablecoin law might be possible very soon. Sen. Gillibrand said, “I think there’s a huge potential for a bipartisan stablecoin bill in both the House and Senate. (…) This is a measurable, doable goal for both chambers to have.” Read more.

more tips:

Opinion: The U.S. Risks Its Position as a Stablecoin Leader – Jason Somensatto, Chainalysis, on CoinDesk

what you should know: Perhaps, a stablecoin bill gets added to a must-pass? This seems like the only hope with the expected stasis of 2024 legislative action caused by the 2024 general election.

Emmer

After the House Republican conference voted privately to nominate Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R, MN) to the Speaker role yesterday, crypto advocates rallied given Emmer’s strong support for digital assets and his desire to keep innovation, its companies and its jobs in the United States.

But a nomination is one thing. A successful election in a House with a slim and rancorous Republican majority is another as witnessed by the previous House Speaker, Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R, CA). Then, in yesterday afternoon, former Republican President Donald Trump’s comments added more controversy.

And just like that, Emmer was out as Speaker. So much for the pledge.

more tips:

Tom Emmer drops out of the Speaker’s race – The Hill

what you should know: For Republicans to sacrifice one of the party’s leaders, again, speaks to what appears to be the inevitable success Democrats will have in the 2024 general election. Blockchain industry execs will be praying Emmer doesn’t quit.

Continue reading “Comments Due Date For IRS Digital Assets Tax Rule Moved; Stablecoin Law Still Possible Say Senators”

NDAA and Senate Banking

The bipartisan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) amendment [S.712] brokered between Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D, NY) and Cynthia Lummis and Senators Elizabeth Warren (D, MA) and Roger Marshall (R, KS) re-appeared yesterday in a press release from team Lummis-Gillibrand. The two “urge” for the inclusion of the Senate-passed amendment in the annual defense budget bill “following reports that Hamas has used unregulated crypto asset exchanges to fund their war in Israel and to pass comprehensive legislation to create a well-regulated and safe crypto asset market in the United States.”

Read the release.  The amendment was announced back in July.

Also yesterday, a spokesperson for Senator Lummis clarified about the process for the current amendment saying, “The Senate and House will have a conference committee where the Senate and House versions are considered for the final bill, so Sens. Lummis and Gillibrand are working to ensure this provision is included in the final version.”

what you should know: The announcement may be an attempt to try and head off the momentum that the drastically more restrictive “Digital Asset Money Laundering Act” [S.2669] introduced by Sens. Warren and Marshall has in light of recent news media reports linking crypto to terrorist funding.  We’ll likely hear more on both legislative efforts when Warren and Lummis have their 5-minutes to question witnesses at Senate Banking’s “Combating the Networks of Illicit Finance and Terrorism” hearing on Thursday. Continue reading “NDAA Amendment Picks Up AML Narrative Around Terrorism; Two HFS Hearings Postponed”

WSJ money laundering data

Blockchain industry participants are continuing their pushback on the data from Elliptic that was used two weeks ago in the original Wall Street Journal article and the follow-up on October 13 about terrorist financing and crypto. Some even want a retraction by the WSJ regarding its conclusions.

Yesterday, Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal said in response to discussion of the disputed data in a tweet on X, “Yes- wrong is wrong. This reported misinformation furthers agendas that demean real human tragedy and genuine and effective efforts to thwart those who are responsible.” And, crypto venture capitalist Nic Carter claimed on X yesterday that, “The [journalists] are aware of their abominable mistake and failed reporting and refused to retract. (Reached via email).”

At the center of the current “retraction” discussion seems to be blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis (the U.S. government is a large client) blog post last Wednesday which provided a deep dive on specific wallet addresses and suggested an incorrect reading of the data used by the WSJ such as: “Of the roughly $82 million in cryptocurrency received by this address, about $450,000 worth of funds were transferred from the known terror-affiliated wallet.” Read the whole thing.

Nevertheless, on Friday, the Wall Street Journal expanded and summarized its coverage of crypto and terrorist financing and, in the process, re-affirmed the use of Elliptic’s data in an article, “Why Hamas Uses Crypto to Raise Money.” Read it.

what you should know: There’s a lotta future business at stake for blockchain analytics firms – specifically, future business with the U.S. government. Among several narratives here is Chainalysis taking on Elliptic, which provided the original data to the WSJ.

WSJ opinion fight

Continue reading “Tillis And Hickenlooper Introduce Proof Of Reserves Bill; Crypto Wallet Data For Terrorist Financing Gets Pushback”

mixers and money laundering

U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced a new proposed rulemaking “that identifies international Convertible Virtual Currency Mixing (CVC mixing) as a class of transactions of primary money laundering concern.” Citing terrorist organizations and illicit finance entities such as Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) as customers of mixing technology, Treasury said the new rules will promote transparency for mixing activities and therefore combat money laundering. Read the release.

Read the 80-page proposal from FinCEN here.  Comments are due 3 months from now pending publication of the proposal in the Federal Register.

FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki, who came aboard in July from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), notes the use of the Patriot Act (Section 311) in the release, “This is FinCEN’s first ever use of the Section 311 authority to target a class of transactions of primary money laundering concern, and, just as with our efforts in the traditional financial system, Treasury will work to identify and root out the illicit use and abuse of the CVC ecosystem.”

Back in August of last year, Treasury made some of its first steps against mixers when it placed Tornado Cash and several dozen crypto wallet addresses on an OFAC’s SDN (Specially Designated Nationals) list. Unfortunately for some crypto owners a few days later, many wallets ran afoul of compliance when they were hit with a “dusting attack” – i.e. law-abiding crypto wallets were sent crypto from sanctioned wallet addresses using the mixing service. 

Coin Center responded forcefully to Treasury’s actions last year which included the observation: “The Tornado Cash Entity, which presumably deployed the Tornado Cash Application, has zero control over the Application today.” CoinCenter also said at the time, “By treating autonomous code as a ‘person’ OFAC exceeds its statutory authority.” Read that one.

What you should know: There is no denying mixers are used for illicit purposes. On the other hand, it’s privacy-preserving processes can protect vulnerable populations needing to transfer funds.

more tips:

Crypto Mixers and AML Compliance – Chainalysis Continue reading “U.S. Treasury Proposes Rulemaking On Crypto Mixers; TradFi Firm DTCC Acquires Securrency”

letter from Sen. Warren

A new Congressional letter originating with Senator Elizabeth Warren (D, MA) and dated Tuesday (see it) makes requests of the White House and Treasury and expresses concerns about terrorist financing using crypto.

A footnote references last week’s Wall Street Journal article connecting the terrorist attacks in Israel to crypto donations received by the terrorist organization Hamas.

The letter and its questions align with the Senator’s [S.2669] Digital Asset Money Laundering Act” co-sponsored by Senator Roger Marshall (R, KS) and a bipartisan list of Senators. Though the questions may be rhetorical (“What steps is the Biden Administration taking to address the use of cryptocurrency by terrorist organizations, including but not limited to Hamas, PIJ, and Hezbollah?”) given Warren’s legislation, answers are requested by October 31.

letter from Sen. Warren – signers

For emphasis on urgency, Sen. Warren reached across Congress and collected a list of 105 signatures (29 Senators and 76 Members of the House) including her own for the letter. Only two were Republicans: Sen. Marshall and Senator John Kennedy (LA).

Notable signers among Democrats include Rep. Jim Himes (CT) and Rep. Josh Gottheimer. Both were “yes” votes on the digital asset market structure and stablecoin bills coming out of the House Financial Services Committee in July.

Notable non-signers among Democrats include House Financial Services (HFS) Ranking Member Maxine Waters (CA) and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (NY).

Waters has publicly supported Democratic leadership’s efforts to stymie digital assets legislation in HFS in the 118th Congress.

Meanwhile, Senator Gillibrand along with Senator Cynthia Lummis (R, WY) have tried to build a bridge to Senator Warren and anti-crypto legislators with the NDAA amendment among other efforts. Gillibrand is also a co-sponsor of the Senate version of the Financial Technology Protection Act [S.1340] along with Senator Ted Budd (R, NC).  The bill was re-introduced in April in both Houses and seeks “to establish an Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism and Illicit Financing.”

more tips:

Bipartisan group presses Biden for crypto crackdown after Hamas attacks – Punchbowl News Continue reading “100 Democrats Join Sen. Warren Letter On Terrorist Financing, Crypto; EU Central Bank On CBDC”

Rep. Emmer on national debt

Speaking just prior to the House Speaker vote at the U.S. Capitol, Majority Whip Rep. Tom Emmer (R, MN) made his case for at a at PGP For Crypto event in Washington, D.C.

Rep. Emmer’s case for digital assets has different elements, but he made clear one benefit, in particular.

He said: “You [have] $33 trillion in debt -we have no way to pay for it right now. We’re not even thinking about how we pay for it. We’re bleeding about a trillion and a half a year.”

“The only hope in my mind we have is… much like the Internet when it exploded back in the 90s – it was allowed to explode. We had something in this country called ‘the boom’ – 25 years of the largest wealth creation in history. Now, some of us believe that the ‘pie’ is just *this* big and we [have] to divvy up the ‘pie’. Others of us believe this is just the beginning. And if we keep this here [in the U.S.] – we allow this innovation to grow here, we allow the 21st century economy and opportunity to be here in the United States of America.”

“And when we start to make some better decisions on how we pay our bills – and what we’re putting money into – we can grow this economy to the point where we can pay that off. That’s the future for the United States of America. And I would argue to my friends on the Senate side [and] my house colleagues that are playing this political game… we gotta stop [and] figure out how to work with the technology and the entrepreneurs that are creating it so it stays right here. This is where it belongs. This is where I think we benefit dramatically from it.”

See the full video of Rep. Emmer at the PGP for Crypto event on YouTube.

Continue reading “Digital Assets To Address National Debt Says Majority Whip Emmer; Fed’s Bowman Wants Regulatory Framework”

protect DeFi

Blockchain industry advocates led by DeFi Education Fund are promoting the new “protectDeFi.org” website, which aspires to protect the interests of decentralized finance particularly as it relates to new digital asset tax rules proposed by U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on August 28.

The origins of industry pushback is the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 as Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith explains in a tweet thread on X.  And on the new Treasury proposal, she adds, “…the proposal includes software developers who might have worked on a front-end interface to a DeFi protocol, and [because] they did so, the IRS may consider them ‘in a position to know’ about future activity on that protocol.. These developers would then have to furnish 1099s and abide by other reporting requirements… This is untenable + would force those persons to stop work or move to more welcoming jurisdictions. As it stands, if this updated definition is adopted by the IRS, it would result in a decimation of the digital assets industry in the U.S.” Read it.

Consensys counsel Bill Hughes joins the industry chorus on X, “… the cost and time required by reporting obligations would cripple most start-up software development projects. And IRS is gravely underestimating those costs (which is typical for agencies during rulemakings).” View more on X.

Final feedback to Treasury and the IRS is due on October 30. The protectDeFi.org website offers an artificial intelligence tool for interested parties who wish to create a letter for feedback purposes.

protect DeFi – Congress

In Congress, the Keep Innovation In America Act co-sponsored by House Financial Services (HFS) Committee Chair Patrick McHenry (R, NC) and Rep. Ritchie Torres (D, NY) among many others (see H.R. 1414) is a bipartisan Congressional effort introduced in March to fix the IRS issue created in the Jobs Act. So far, the bill has not made it out of Committee.

Continue reading “DeFi Meets Treasury And IRS Proposal; Offshore Momentum In Hong Kong And Australia”

sanctions evasion

The chances of Congress taking up terrorist financing – whether through hearings or legislation or both – appear to be increasing.

On Friday, reporter Angus Berwick of The Wall Street Journal again chronicles an example of sanctions evasion where crypto is the middleman for “Criminal Gangs, Rich Russians and a Hamas-Linked Terror Group.” At the center of the storm is a Moscow-based exchange called Garantex which the WSJ says allows a rubles-to-crypto-to-dollar transfer. Mr. Berwick draws a connection to his previous article which used blockchain analytic firm Elliptic’s data saying, “Garantex’s growing role as a global conduit for illicit funds was underscored this month by evidence that Palestinian militants in part financed their operations through crypto in the lead-up to the Oct. 7 attacks in Israel.” Read Friday’s WSJ article on Garantex.

Back in March, Haaretz reported that Hamas was no longer using “Bitcoin Cryptocurrency” due to its trackability by government authorities. Read more.

Congress reacts

Meanwhile, Politico picked up the baton on Congressional reaction to sanctions evasion using crypto with more concerns expressed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D, MA). The Senator tells Politico’s Jasper Goodman, “The danger of crypto-financed terrorism is real and should be an urgent priority for Congress… There’s a growing bipartisan coalition of senators who are committed to passing this bill and fighting back against terrorism worldwide by choking off the financing.” Read more. Her bill – “The Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act” [S.2669] – now has 15 co-sponsors including 2 Republicans and 1 Independent. Continue reading “Crypto Illicit Financing Concerns Grow In Senate; California Approves Regulatory Framework Path”