As Members of Congress’ interest in blockchain has grown in recent years, Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D), who represents the Fourth District of Massachusetts, has not *just* been along for the ride.
As a freshman Congressman in the 117th Congress, Rep. Auchincloss was a member of the House Financial Services (HFS) Committee and was exposed to, and engaged in, the intricacies of securities matters including the emerging digital assets industry.
In the 118th Congress, though no longer on HFS, his interest in technology and blockchain has been further piqued by service on the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee and the Select Committee on Strategic Competition Between the United States and China.
Today, he remains impactful on financial matters with his “Power of the Mint Act” [H.R.3402], which is co-sponsored by Rep. French Hill (R, AR), and seeks to assert Congressional power over any decision by the Federal Reserve to roll out a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
Rep. Auchincloss also recently voted in favor of the Financial Innovation and Technology Act for the 21st Century [H.R.4763] (FIT 21) and the House resolution to rescind the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) [H.J.R.109].
Yesterday, blockchain tipsheet spoke with Rep. Auchincloss about a range of digital asset issues including:
-
- Support for FIT 21 and the SAB 121 resolution
- Blockchain use cases
- The Democratic caucus and digital assets
- Power of the Mint Act and CBDCs
- Wholesale versus retail CBDC
- Stablecoins and the US Dollar
- Congressional staff
- The next Congress…
(This transcript has been edited for clarity.)
blockchain tipsheet: You voted for the SAB 121 resolution as well as FIT 21. Why did you support each of these bills?
Rep. Jake Auchincloss: I voted for SAB 121 because the Government Accountability Office found – and this is a nonpartisan, independent body – that the SEC ran afoul of Administrative Law in issuing what really is a rule under the banner of guidance, and thereby circumventing rule-making.
It’s important that Congress uphold the rule of law and that we uphold Administrative Law process. To me, I am policy agnostic, but this was a process fidelity issue.
And, on FIT 21? Continue reading “Rep. Auchincloss On CBDCs, Support For Digital Assets Legislation”