Here’s today’s blockchain tipsheet… prefer it by email? Sign up here.
mainstream Choke Point
A New York Magazine article yesterday takes “Choke Point 2.0” mainstream and re-hashes evidence suggesting the Biden Administration and government regulators may be trying to suppress crypto.
New York Mag’s Jen Wieczner isn’t totally convinced, “Whether one buys the crypto industry line of a stealth war, or the official administration line of various regulators just doing their jobs, there are objectively several fronts where the sector is facing much more intense scrutiny.” Still, Wieczner spends a lot of time reconstructing the finer points of the Choke Point 2.0 argument. I mean A LOT of time.
It was only back in February that New York Magazine ran a piece titled, “Can Gary Gensler Survive Crypto Winter?” which was arguably supportive of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair’s position and which some saw as a way for Gensler to reach out NY Mag’s strong, Democratic party base.
UK crypto consult comment
In a letter sent to the UK Treasury on April 29 by venture capital firm a16z as part of the government’s request for comment, the firm asks that a “more nuanced” regulatory approach occur with cryptocurrency. Miles Jennings, General Counsel at a16z, tweeted yesterday, “This weekend, we filed a letter applauding 👏 the UK’s efforts to provide regulatory clarity and enhance consumer protections in web3.”
Brian Quintenz, the venture firm’s head of policy, added a thread of his own on Twitter that condemned the SEC’s way of doing business and said in part, “The UK’s suggested approach looks to ensure similar regulatory outcomes for crypto and doesn’t assume that superficially related activities automatically create the same legacy financial risks and require the exact same regulatory rules.” Read more on The Block.
more tips:
HMT crypto consultation response (PDF) – a16zcrypto Continue reading “Choke Point 2.0 Theme Hits Mainstream Media; UK Crypto Consult Comment”