CFPB rule hearing
The House Financial Services (HFS) Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion hearing led yesterday by Chair French Hill (R, AR) on the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed rule on non-banks, i.e. payment apps.
At the hearing’s open, Chair Hill highlighted bipartisan concerns about the rule which he said could unnecessarily inhibit industry and innovation, limit consumer choice and, in general, is an overreach by the agency. Crypto and digital wallets are swept up in the rule.
See hearing video and witnesses’ prepared testimony.
Over the course of the hearing, of the five witnesses, only Professor Christopher Odinet from the University of Iowa supported the rule.
Chair Hill added in his opening remarks, “There is no doubt that this proposal will decrease incentives to innovate in the payments space and leave consumers encumbered with fewer firms from which to choose a payment method–that decreases competition.” Read the entire statement here.
However, Democratic leadership led by HFS Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D, CA) and Subcommittee Ranking Member Steven Lynch (D, MA) staked out its familiar position around consumer protections and fears of “Big Tech’s” undue influence and therefore supported the rule.
Crypto skeptic Rep. Brad Sherman (D, CA) proffered his support for the rule and connected it to the digital assets industry and lobbying. In the Q&A, Rep Sherman delivered some zingers to the lobbying community, “This initial pre-rule is long past due. I’ve been in this town for a long time, and I’ve snuck in at least once to ‘Lobbying 101″ secret classes. The rule is very simple. The teaching is simple…”
Sherman continued, “If the facts are on your side, argue the facts. If you’re on the side of good public policy, argue the public policy. And if the facts are against you and the public policies are against you, argue the procedure. That is mostly what we have here. People telling us that the procedure is somehow off now the most extreme of those arguments is to have the cryptocurrency industry come in and say how god-awful outrageous it is that somebody would treat crypto as a currency. If you aspire to be a currency you should aspire to be regulated like a currency.”
In addition to all HFS Republicans expressing concern during the hearing, a January 5 letter (see it) showed seven HFS Democrats who have their own reservations including Rep. Jim Himes (D, CT), Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D, NJ) and Rep. Wiley Nickel (D, NC). Continue reading “New Treasury Report On Hamas, Crypto; Digital Assets Hearing Sees Bipartisan CFPB Rule Concerns”